Why is catcher in the rye associated with murders




















You might want to read this paper, quite good. Click to access lennon. I do not follow such idiotic fake science other than to marvel at how clever Intel is in creating noise and distraction. Regarding Lennon, wave of the hand dismissals may be psychologically reassuring, but your readers, if serious, are tasked to do some reading and thinking on the subject. They might even, as I did, get hold of the movie Let Him Be, and study the people in it.

I took screen grabs of the singing scenes and did facial comparisons to Lennon. Read the lyrics on the Double Fantasy album, produced by David Geffen, surely in on the game too. It was no coincidence that when the Beatles stopped performing in public, their music changed in both quality and depth. It was written by others, and the instrumentation became more professional, done by studio musicians just as American rock and roll of that time was done by the Wrecking Crew.

The Beatles were fake fake fake. Water under the bridge. Your comment is so unusual … might have it framed! I appreciate it. My curiosity was piqued by how emphatic you seemed to be in fact, when afmeyers and you commented I thought I was privy to some excellent trolling. I clicked the first link you offered out of curiosity, and closed the tab ten minutes later in awe.

People are amazing at seeing what they want to see, and connecting coincidences into dots before labeling naysayers as sheep with an air of smug concern, desperate to enlighten the masses as to how John Lennon was not in fact killed because… he was actually some sort of intelligence operative?

The only convincing part is that John Lennon and his look-alike look alike. Literally everything else has a clearer and more likely explanation.

The guy that looks like Lennon has Beatles memorabilia? He must be the man himself! Thus having reasonable motive outside of being Lennon to collect Beatles trinkets. Have you ever seen a star collect memorabilia of themselves?

No one does that. The Motive? After postulating that Lennon apparently wanted to make a movie telling his fans to stop searching for him, this is dismissed as obvious tomfoolery. Obviously this low-budget, completely unknown movie was made under government authority in order to, do, ahh, something… Seriously?

My arrogant tone and casual demeanor likely killed any chance of that happening. Just go onto the article you linked, please. The constant complaints about not getting a clear photo and the following insinuations that this was intentional fall apart when he later shows some decent straight-on head shots.

Convince people someone who they all think is dead, is actually dead, by making a movie about the possibility of that person being alive, with the supposedly dead individual being in the movie themselves, before then finally dismissing that possibility in the movie. The most insane assertion here, is that popular music was and is being controlled by the government themselves in order to destroy christianity.

There exist a strong and fairly excellent christian music genre that an all powerful, christian-hating government could easily destroy. Yet it still stands. Also making pop hits is a hard and inconsistent job, really not worth the financing and cover ups it would take the government. Curious if anyone is still paying attention, so signing up to be notified of responses via this post.

Mark — with all due respect. Sometimes — it really is just some nutcase with an awfully written book and sometimes really just is some nutcase that saw a Scorcese picture and wanted to impress Jodie Foster spelling apologies in advance. Tax evasion. Government corruption. Yeah there were files on John Lennon.

He was funding people like Michael X in London and was a cause for concern of a traditionally conservative and cold war paranoia period in Western politics…. Just fucking STOP the bullshit about faked deaths and etc. Grow up. If you want conspiracy theories look into things like the overthrow of Gaddafi due to the gold standard. Have some damn self respect. I do honest research and base my views on evidence. You are belief-oriented.

If you are paying attention, and you think you are, I know, you realize at a certain point that everything you know is quite wrong. So stop with the harassment. Whatever it is you think you are doing, it is not useful. Two other thoughts come to mind when I read stuff like this: One, the American public are sheep, we all know. Certain sheep escape the paddock, get out and wander free.

However, Intel knows this, and has provided you with a thousand directions to make sure you remain in a state of ignorance. You have been and are being very badly fooled. Do you have the ablls, the fortitude, to look in the mirror? My initial impression is no. Prove me wrong, crackpot. Cooper to be one in the same.

Unless of course he left his fingerprints or some D. I get the derision and ridicule, and all I can say is that my opinions are based on evidence, while yours are merely the wisdom of others re-transcribed so as to make us think that they are original thoughts. F off. I left my apology below. Timothy Mcveigh was interviewed at the scene by Michelle Rauch on March 30th and the Oklahoma city Bombing went down in What else is new?

Keep after them,MARK…. Well,people do change their opinion. You seemed to be rather adamant and firm in your conviction, so it grabbed my attention,and after a little review,I came away with a different point of view. OLD Lesson learned,Never rush to judgement without all the facts. Pingback: Catcher in the Rye « Extraordinary Words.

Pingback: psych references — Keeping Sweet in Seattle. Ewan Cameron under the direction of the C. George H. They carry it in vodka bottles since the liquid is quite similar. Pingback: The Last 13 of Pingback: Nine Paragraphs Those Sentences. Pingback: Anonymous.

Reblogged this on Wonderfulwizardofoz's Blog. Robert John Bardo also carried a copy of catcher in the rye when he murdered actress Rebecca Schaeffer in Bardo was seen throwing his copy of Catcher in the rye onto a rooftop as he fled the murder of Schaeffer.

It will always be helpful to read articles from other writers and use a little something from their websites. From the Reunion to the whole reunion of life it all seems to be lived over and over. But in reality we only live it once….. YET on we go, searching for the truth. Whoever wrote this article really needs to do some research.

There is once a victim named Kirsten Hinckley. Hinckley died of a gunshot wound. That is prophetic and a crazy world! Reblogged this on Echoshadow. This stuff reads like fiction. Good read and thanks. The matter under discussion here seems to be whether the book Catcher In The Rye is a trigger.

A mistake being made, in my opinion, is to think the book can only be a trigger if the target is obsessed with it. I believe you need to consider the book could be a trigger without being an obsession. For example, if CITR was shelved with a lot of other books Hinkley happened to own, its association with Hinkley and his attempted assassination of Reagan seems very tenuous.

They will do that when they have moved on to much better techniques and the political importance of the disclosure is minor. Or perhaps somehow favorable to them in different political circumstances. Maybe the book just resonates too strongly and relates too much to their own life for them to be able to separate fiction from reality. Posted in Leisure , Reseach , Uncategorized Tagged americanstudies , bookreview , thecatcherintherye. View more posts by Liv.

Subscribe to Liv's posts. Blogger Log in. American Studies. The story follows a mentally ill teen, Holden Caulfield, delving into his thoughts and feelings.

The Catcher in the Rye should be banned for it's many controversial views and topics, including the use. In order to fully answer this question we must first understand what violence is. Violence is the use of one's powers to inflict mental or physical injury upon another; examples of this would be rape or murder. Violence in entertainment reaches the public by way of television, movies, plays, music, and novels.

Through the course of this essay it will be proven that violence in entertainment is a major factor in the escalation of violence in society, once. Violence is the use of one's powers to inflict mental or physical injury upon another, examples of this would be rape or murder.



0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000